Posted On 2025-11-05
Author Shilpa Desai
For small and mid-sized companies planning an IPO or Initial Public Offerings, time is the most unpredictable variable. Some reach the market within a few months. Others spend over a year getting there, even with the same exchanges and merchant bankers.
The difference isn’t in the rules, it’s in the readiness. Audit trails, documentation flow, valuation clarity, and regulator feedback cycles all decide whether your timeline moves in quarters or weeks.
This article walks through that journey, from early preparation to final listing and breaks down where time is actually spent, and how companies are now managing to compress it without compromising compliance.
For most small and medium enterprises, an IPO is a year-long transformation. While investors usually see only the final eight to ten weeks from offer to listing, the company’s journey begins nearly a year earlier with audits, filings, and compliance work.
The timeline below captures the full cycle, from internal readiness to trading debut.
Once the management decides to go public, the company begins preparing its financials and governance systems for market scrutiny.
This stage involves:
Revising and auditing three years of financial statements in accordance with Ind-AS or other applicable Accounting Standards..
Appointing a (Securities and Exchange Board of India) SEBI-registered merchant banker and legal advisors.
Addressing related-party transactions and pending litigations (if any).
Setting up a board structure that meets SEBI’s governance norms.
Many SMEs spend months preparing before they file, but public timelines show the regulatory stage is often shorter than commonly assumed. For example, Goyal Salt filed its DRHP(Draft Red Herring Prospectus) on 31 July 2023 and listed on 11 October 2023 (≈2.5 months from filing to listing). K2 Infragen shows a similar pattern: DRHP dated 21 December 2023 and listed on 8 April 2024 (≈3.5 months). These cases demonstrate that a clean filing can move through the approval and listing phases in a matter of weeks, but the time a company spends preparing before filing is typically not published and should not be asserted without primary evidence.
The business starts the regulatory assessment process after submitting the Draft Red Herring Prospectus (DRHP).
SEBI and the SME platforms of NSE or BSE examine eligibility, disclosures, and risk factors.
Observations are typically issued within 30 days.
The company’s response time, along with the accuracy of its disclosures, determines the total review duration.
By the time approval arrives, the company’s focus shifts outward. Merchant bankers lead roadshows and investor calls; analysts test appetite; price bands are set. Within a few weeks, demand discovery gives way to allotment, refunds, and the first day of trading.
Putting it all together:
Even though SEBI and stock exchanges are using automation to speed up IPO reviews, the real timeline advantage still lies inside the company. Delays rarely happen at the regulator’s desk, they happen in audit trails, financial reconciliations, and team coordination.
Based on how recent SME IPOs have been executed, five internal levers consistently determine whether a company lists in nine months or drags past eighteen. Each of them can be controlled well before filing the DRHP.
Most SMEs begin cleaning their books after appointing a merchant banker, when discrepancies in revenue recognition or related-party transactions surface. That can easily add 8–10 weeks of revision cycles.
Companies that conduct a pre-IPO audit at least six months in advance can avoid this bottleneck. Merchant bankers can then focus on valuation and DRHP structuring instead of reconciling past records. For example, Netweb Technologies filed its DRHP in March 2023 and listed in July 2023, showing that with strong pre-filing preparation, a streamlined listing can happen within four months.
In practice, this means running two audits in parallel, one statutory and one IPO-focused, with clear mapping between segment revenue, debt positions, and contingent liabilities. The cleaner the data trail, the shorter the SEBI Q&A cycle.
An IPO readiness diagnostic is essentially a mock IPO audit, a structured assessment that mirrors how SEBI and merchant bankers would review your company during the filing stage. Leading firms like EY, PwC, and KPMG run these diagnostics before the merchant banker is even onboarded.
The process typically covers five pillars:
Financial reporting quality — verifying whether accounting standards, segment disclosures, and revenue recognition align with Ind-AS and SEBI norms.
Governance structure — ensuring board independence, related-party transparency, and internal control documentation.
Legal and compliance mapping — checking (Registrar of Companies) ROC filings, director DINs (Director Identification Number), share allotments, and pending litigations for gaps.
Operational controls — testing data reliability from ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) or MIS systems that feed into financial statements.
Investor narrative — assessing how well business risks and growth drivers are framed for valuation analysts.
The outcome is a readiness report, ranking each pillar by risk level (high, medium, low) and outlining corrective actions. Companies that complete such diagnostics before filing often experience fewer regulator observations and smoother review cycles, in some cases shaving several weeks off the approval phase.
One of the biggest reasons SME IPOs stall mid-way is financial data inconsistency. When quarterly results don’t reconcile with audited statements, merchant bankers and regulators end up requesting clarifications, often pushing approvals by weeks.
Investor-ready financials mean your books are continuously audit-grade, not just cleaned up at year-end. Companies that follow this practice typically:
Align quarterly closes with Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) and SEBI ICDR disclosure norms rather than internal MIS formats.
Digitally reconcile subsidiary and group company accounts to avoid mismatch during consolidation.
Pre-audit quarterly numbers through a limited review, a practice that has now become standard among mid-cap IPO candidates.
Maintain a live data room so merchant bankers and due-diligence teams can access statements, contracts, and tax filings in real time.
Firms that adopt continuous investor-grade quarterly reporting often reduce time spent in financial diligence and avoid late-stage auditor or regulator queries.
IPO timelines rarely break because of valuation or market sentiment, they break in coordination gaps. Compliance files move faster than financial audits, legal disclosures lag, and suddenly, the draft prospectus turns into a patchwork of revisions.
A synchronized IPO workflow starts six months before filing:
Compliance teams flag related-party transactions, pending litigations, and director disclosures early.
Finance teams ensure those disclosures align with audited statements and contingent liabilities.
Legal teams cross-verify these data points with statutory filings and corporate records.
This parallel execution model, instead of linear hand-offs, can significantly reduce review cycles and avoid late-stage bottlenecks. Some merchant bankers even run a “mock SEBI review” internally to test documentation consistency before the actual submission.
In short, readiness is not just about paperwork. It’s about ensuring every section of your offer document speaks the same language, legally, financially, and operationally.
Reverse-engineering the IPO calendar is how seasoned CFOs keep control. Start from your target listing date and work backward, fixing milestones for audit closure, DRHP filing, SEBI approval, and investor roadshows.
This simulation exposes timing conflicts early, like when quarterly audits overlap with regulatory submissions or holidays delay review cycles. Many merchant bankers now use IPO scheduling tools that auto-adjust dependencies to maintain momentum.
SME IPO timelines are affected more by poor preparation than by compliance requirements. The companies that move faster are the ones that start audits early, maintain investor-ready financials, and align compliance and legal functions before filing. At CFO Bridge, we help businesses translate this precision into practice, coordinating internal teams, synchronizing advisors, and running readiness diagnostics that keep the IPO calendar on track.
Talk to our experts to map your IPO readiness and discover how fast your business can go from planning to listing, confidently and compliantly.
In India, well-prepared SME IPOs can list within 3 to 6 months from filing, though the timeline is tentative and differs from case to case depending on the company’s readiness.
Pre-IPO preparation, SEBI/exchange review, marketing and allotment, and final listing on the SME platform.
In rare but well-prepared cases, the regulatory review phase can conclude in 8–12 weeks, especially when auditor readiness, governance alignment, and documentation are in order. However, SME IPOs generally take longer unless these conditions are met.
Incomplete disclosures, financial restatements, compliance gaps, and poor coordination between auditors, bankers, and legal teams. According to SEBI’s General Information Document for Public Offers, such lapses in due diligence and documentation can extend the approval timeline.
CEO Description
Here's a curated list of finance leaders for your industry and company size.
Finding your perfect CFO partners...
Let's talk! Book your free consultation today